Claude Cowork vs OpenClaw, and the open source system a team owns
OpenClaw is an open-source personal agent that runs on your own machine, and Claude Cowork is a closed, hosted assistant; Kortix is open source: the system a team runs. This page compares them on source, models, where they run, configuration and access, then shows when each one fits.
Kortix, Claude Cowork and OpenClaw, side by side
Kortix leads the table, and each rival column states only what that project's own live pages document.
| Criteria | Kortix | Claude Cowork | OpenClaw |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01Source | Open source. Read it, fork it, audit it. | Closed | Open source |
| 02Models | Any model provider with your own keys. | Anthropic's models only | Hosted and local model providers as plugins |
| 03Where it runs | Kortix Cloud, your VPC, or your own on-prem network | Anthropic's servers, or your own cloud account | On your own computer; one Gateway can serve a team |
| 04Your configuration | Files in a git repo you own | In your Claude account | The Gateway config; state and memory on your hardware |
| 05Access | Self-host is free | Paid Claude plans only | No paid tier, hosted service or token |
One repo is the company
project (git repo + kortix.yaml)├─ agents/ # who does the work├─ skills/ # how your company does a job├─ memory/ # what it has learned└─ kortix.yaml # connectors, triggers, machine imageAgents, skills, memory and connector configuration live in files a team reads and diffs.
What Claude Cowork is
Claude Cowork is Anthropic's agent for knowledge work. You describe an outcome, and it runs multi-step tasks inside Claude's app on desktop, web and mobile, with scheduled tasks and projects. Cowork is available on paid plans: Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise. Its sessions run in the cloud on Anthropic's servers in an isolated environment, and the sessions and files save to your Claude account, so the work follows you across surfaces. To touch a local file or a browser, Cowork reaches your machine through the Claude Desktop app (Get started with Claude Cowork).
Anthropic is direct about the risks. The safe-use guidance separates read tools from write tools, warns that prompt injection arrives through the content Claude reads, and notes that computer use runs without the permission checks that gate other tools (Use Claude Cowork safely). Those are real controls to plan around. They also live inside Anthropic's product, on Anthropic's models, in Anthropic's cloud.
What OpenClaw is
OpenClaw is an open-source AI assistant that runs on your own computer and meets you in the channels you already use. Its own repository describes Discord, iMessage, Slack, Teams, Telegram, WhatsApp and more than twenty more, plus native apps for macOS, iOS, Android, Windows and Linux. One Gateway runs it as a personal assistant on a laptop or as a shared team deployment, and configuration is the only difference between the two (OpenClaw on GitHub).
State, memory and credentials live on your hardware, and the models and agent harnesses are plugins you swap without changing anything else. The project's own site states that there is no paid tier, hosted service or token, and that it is stewarded by an independent foundation (openclaw.ai). So OpenClaw and Claude Cowork answer the ownership question in opposite ways, and both keep the work at the scale of one person or one machine.
When to choose which
Choose OpenClaw if you want a personal assistant on your own hardware, reachable from the chat apps you already keep open, with your own models. Choose Claude Cowork if you want an agent inside the Claude app you already pay for, on Anthropic's models, with the managed admin controls that come with Team and Enterprise plans.
Choose Kortix if the unit of work is a team or a whole company. Kortix is the open-source AI Operating System: your agents, skills, company memory, and connectors in one git repo you own, with the agents working on real cloud computers. That is the difference the other two do not cover. A team needs shared configuration it can read, a rule on which agent may touch which tool, and a review step before an agent's work reaches anything real. The open-source Claude Cowork alternatives page maps the wider field, and Claude Cowork vs OpenWork covers one of the open-source desktops.
Why a team picks Kortix
In Kortix, configuration is files a team can diff and review. An agent is agents/<name>.md (behavior) plus an agents.<name> block in kortix.yaml (governance). Each session has its own isolated machine and branch. Session work reaches main through a change request. Merge is default-deny for agents. Per-resource permissions cover people and agents, with roles, groups, and an audit trail. Run it on Kortix Cloud, in your VPC, or on your own on-prem network. Self-host is free. The source is public at Kortix on GitHub, and if you already run Claude Cowork, migrating to Kortix starts with one job in one repo. For a worked comparison against the closed incumbent, Read the Kortix blog.
Claude Cowork and OpenClaw, the questions teams ask
- Q01
Is OpenClaw built for the same work as Claude Cowork?
- OpenClaw is a personal agent that runs on your own computer and meets you in the chat apps you already use, and Claude Cowork is Anthropic's hosted agent for knowledge work inside Claude's app. Kortix is the open-source AI Operating System a team runs: one git repo for the agents, skills, memory and connectors, with session work landing through a change request.
- Q02
Which one keeps the configuration in a repo the team owns?
- Kortix does. Your agents, skills, company memory, and connectors live in one git repo you own, so a team can read, diff and review what an agent runs from. Claude Cowork keeps the configuration in your Claude account, and OpenClaw keeps its config and memory on the machine it runs on.
- Q03
Can a team run Kortix on its own infrastructure?
- Yes. Run it on Kortix Cloud, in your VPC, or on your own on-prem network. Self-host is free, and the self-hosting guide covers the install.
Own the system your agents run on
Start with one job, in one repo you own.